
According To The Scriptures:
If baptism is essential to salvation, why would John refuse to use an essential part of salvation's requirements on the Pharisees and Sadducees -- the very thing he was sent to do (Matt. 3:7)? "The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe" (John 1:7).
Why would Paul say, under the leadership of the Holy Ghost, "For Christ sent me NOT to baptize, but to preach the gospel" (I Cor. 1:17)? Because baptism is NOT a part of the gospel that will save. If baptism is essential to salvation, why would Paul thank God that he did not help people to get saved? "I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius" (I Cor. 1:14). Every scripture used to teach baptism is essential to salvation must be taken out of context.
Scriptures that teach the believer is saved before baptism include: "Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God" (I John 5:1). Jesus said, "He that believeth on him is (present tense) not condemned" (John 3:18). "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins" (Acts 10:43). We who believe that a believer is saved before baptism are in agreement with Jesus and all the prophets!